1 / 3 CGHC010284582026 2026:CGHC:37963 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1024 of 2026 1 - Ved Prakash Yadav S/o Satanand Yadav Aged About 20 Years R/o- Nayapara, Ward No. 1, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Roll No. 6204074895)(Allottted Post C.I.S.F.) 2 - Ayush Hukre S/o Duliram Hukre Aged About 21 Years R/o. Kirnapur, Balaghat, District- Balaghat Madhya Pradesh. (Roll No. 6204069600) (Allotted Post B S F) 3 - Gopal Achale S/o Balu Singh Achale Aged About 26 Years R/o. Ralamandal, Post Lunhera, Bujurg, District- Manawardhar, Madhya Pradesh (Roll No. 6006038903) (Allotted Post C I S F) 4 - Rishikesh Sharma S/o Brijmohan Sharma Aged About 23 Years R/o. House No. 135, Moroli, Mehgaon, Moroli, P.O. Soni, District- Bhind, Madhya Pradesh. (Roll No. 6005047856) (Allotted Post C I S F) 5 - Deepak Mandloi S/o Bhanvarlal Mandloi Aged About 23 Years R/o. Mandawar, Narsinghgarh, District- Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh. (Roll No. 6001015416) (Allotted Post I T B P) 6 - Sujeet Chaturvedi S/o Sanjeev Chaturvedi Aged About 24 Years R/o. House No. 2178/28, Behind Hotel Queen Castle, Rathode Complex Street, Sai Nagar, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Roll No. 6204082621) (Allotted Post C I S F) 7 - Mohit Kumar S/o Khamhan Lal Aged About 23 Years R/o. Village Kalartarai, Post Office Kharenga, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. (Roll No. 6204044686) (Allotted Post C I S F) 8 - Tikeshwar Kumar S/o Rupram Nishadh Aged About 26 Years R/o. Ward No. 2, Baghamara, P.O. Gunderdehi, District- Balod Chhattisgarh. (Roll No. 6204050256) (Allotted Post S S B) ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.08.25 18:38:25 +0530 2 / 3 9 - Manish Kumar Bhatt S/o Shri Krishna Mohan Bhatt Aged About 26 Years R/o. Village- Rajpura, Post Hirdaychak, District- Arwal Bihar. (Roll No. 6204024985) (Allotted Post C R P F) 10 - Suraj Singh S/o Somendra Singh Aged About 22 Years R/o Village And Post Jaitpura Madhi, Tahsil Raun, District Bhind, Madhya Pradesh (Roll No. 6005033060) (Allotted Post C I S F) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Shri S. Gopalakrishnan Chairman/ Director Block No. 12, C G O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, Pin 110003 2 - Shri Gyanendra Pratap Singh Director, General C R P F (Recruitment Branch) East Block 07, Level 04, Sector 01, R.K. Puram, New Delhi (Through Its Director General) 3 - Shri Praveer Ranjan Directorate General, C I S F (H Q) C G O Complex, Block 13, Lodhi Road, New Delhi Pin 110003 4 - Shri Praveen Kumar Director General Of Border Security Force (B S F), Block 10, C G O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, Pin 110003 5 - Shri Sanjay Singhal Director General Of Sashastra Seema Bal, Block V (East), R K Puram, New Delhi, Pin 110066 ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Laloo Yadav, Advocate For Respondents/UOI : Ms. Shweta Rai, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru) Order on Board 24/08/2026 1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 15.04.2026 passed by this Court in WPS No. 3263 of 2026, whereby the respondent authorities were directed to conclude the process of identification/genuineness of the withheld petitioners and complete their dossier/domicile verification expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 3 / 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the order passed by this court has not been complied with. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, by referring to the status report placed on record, submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the respondent authorities took necessary steps for verification of the petitioners. The cases were processed through the concerned authorities, including the requisite biometric, signature/handwriting, LTI and domicile verification, as applicable. The verification process in respect of the petitioners has now been completed and the cases have been forwarded to the concerned Nodal Force/Recruitment Directorate for taking further consequential steps with regard to release of the withheld result/appointment, as per the applicable procedure. 4. The status report and the documents placed on record indicate that the directions issued by this Court have been acted upon and the verification process, which was the subject matter of the order dated 15.04.2026, has been completed. The respondents have also taken steps for further processing of the candidature of the petitioners. In view of the aforesaid compliance, no further direction is called for in the present contempt proceedings. 5. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands disposed of as having been complied with. The rule is discharged. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE ashu