20.08.2026 Item 19 & 20 Ct. No. 39 AN C.R.M.(A) 2108 of 2026 (ALLOWED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Rabindra Sarobar Police Station Case No. 80 of 2026 dated 20.06.2026 under Sections 126(2) / 115(2) / 74 / 351(2) / 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to C.G.R. Case No. 1981 of 2026 now pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore. In the matter of : Arup Kumar Das … Petitioner. Mr. Sabyasachi Mukherjee Mr. Ranabeer Halder …for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Ray Mr. Sourav Mondal …for the State. And C.R.M.(A) 2115 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Rabindra Sarobar Police Station Case No. 80 of 2026 dated 20.06.2026 under Sections 126(2) / 115(2) / 74 / 351(2) / 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to C.G.R. Case No. 1981 of 2026 now pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore. In the matter of : Asoke Kumar Das … Petitioner. Mr. Sabyasachi Mukherjee Mr. Ranabeer Halder …for the Petitioner. Mr. Subhajit Chatterjee Ms. Tatini Sengupta …for the State 1. Item nos. 19 and 20 of today’s list are taken up together with since both the cases arise in connection with the same Police Station case number and same incident. In C.R.M.(A) 2108 of 2026, the petitioner is the son of accused no. 2, the father, who is another accused in C.R.M.(A) 2115 of 2026. 2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case in connection with a club dispute. The petitioners are the treasurer of the said club and the de facto complainant tried to take over the said charge and dispute arose between the petitioners and de- facto complainant. On the said situation, a false case was registered. He prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioners on any terms and conditions. 3. On the other hand, learned advocate representing the State produces the case diary, the memo of evidence and relies upon the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, 2023 and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 4. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusing the materials available on record, the case diary including the injury report and the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, 2023, this Court finds that the injury suffered by the victim is simple in nature and furthermore, there is no such convincing materials to refuse the prayer for anticipatory bail of both the petitioners. 2 5. In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any necessity for custodial interrogation/detention of both the petitioners and, hence, prayer for anticipatory bail of both the petitioners are considered and allowed on the following conditions. 6. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, both the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. In the event both the petitioners fail to comply with the conditions as imposed by this Court, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 8. C.R.M.(A) 2108 of 2026 and C.R.M.(A) 2115 of 2026 stand disposed of. 9. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 10. The concerned Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) 4