Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3360 (GAU)

SRI RAJANI DAIMARY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

I.A.(Crl.)/366/2026 · 2026-04-06

Kaushik Goswami, Michael Zothankhuma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010066542026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/366/2026 SRI RAJANI DAIMARY SON OF SRI SANG DAIMARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JENGARBORI, POLICE STATION- LAHORIGHA, DISTRICT- MORIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:SMTI KRISHNA BORDOLOI WIFE OF SRI JIBON BORDOLOI RESIDENTOF VILLAGE- JENGARBORI POLICE STATION-LAHORIGHAT DISTRICT- MORIGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B SARMA, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 07.04.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that Page No.# 2/2 there is a delay of 29 days in preferring the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. 2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. 3. Accordingly, the delay of 29 days is condoned. 4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. 5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant