1 CGHC010329512025 2026:CGHC:36519 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 823 of 2025 1 - Dashoda D/o Late Goverdhan Aged About 65 Years (At Present) Caste- Teli, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o Village- Palari, Tahsil- Gurur, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Village- Nagadabri, Tahsil- Balod, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 2 - Fulbai D/o Late Goverdhan Aged About 57 Years (At Present) Caste- Teli, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o Village- Palari, Tahsil- Gurur, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Village Jhurmatrai, Tahsil And District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ishwari D/o Late Goverdhan Aged About 52 Years (At Present) Caste- Teli, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o Village- Palari, Tehsil- Gurur, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Gangoripar, Tahsil- Gurur, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 4 - Rameshwari S/o Late Goverdhan Aged About 47 Years (At Present) Caste- Teli, Occupation-Cultivator, R/o Village- Palari, Tehsil- Gurur, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Bhanpuri, Tahsil And District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Applicants versus 1 - Arjun S/o Late Goverdhan Aged About 63 Years (At Present) Caste- Teli, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o Village- Palari, Tahsil- Gurur, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 2 - Amrit Bai Wd/o Late Goverdhan Aged About 72 Years (At Present) Caste- Teli, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o Village- Palari, Tahsil- Gurur, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Balod, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.08.18 11:07:14 +0530 2 For Applicants : Mr. Manish Thakur, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 17.08.2026 1. Present MCC has been filed for restoration of Second Appeal No.468/2017, which was dismissed by this Court on 03.12.2022 for want of prosecution. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that since MCC No.803/2025 has already been filed for restoration of Second Appeal No.468/2017, present MCC has inadvertently been filed for the same purpose. Hence, learned counsel seeks permission of the Court to withdraw present application i.e. MCC No.823/2025. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection on the above prayer made on behalf of the applicants. 4. On due consideration, the prayer of the applicants is allowed and they are permitted to withdraw the instant MCC. 5. Accordingly, present MCC is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini