D/L68 04.08.2026 Bpg. Allowed C.R.M. (A) 1930 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Bhimpur Police Station Case No.340 of 2025 dated 16.12.2025 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Kumaresh Biswas & Ors. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Prabir Majumder Mr. Snehansu Majumder Mr. Debraj Shil Ms. Sangeeta Chakraborty Ms. Anindita Kundu. …for the petitioners. Mr. Somnath Bera. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that there was a dispute and scuffle between the family of the present petitioners and that of the de facto complainant. Both parties sustained injury. Criminal cases have been registered at the behest of both the parties. So far as the present case is concerned where the petitioners have been implicated as accused. The injury report was prepared almost after eight days after the incident. Learned advocate for the State produces the statement of the injured as well as the injury report. I have taken into account the nature of the injury. Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion that custodial 2 detention of the present petitioners are unwarranted. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, Kumaresh Biswas, Shilpi Biswas and Kamalesh Biswas shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is in progress, petitioner nos.1 and 3 will meet with the investigating officer of the case within a period of 10 days from date and on all subsequent dates as the investigating officer considers fit and proper for the sake of investigation. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, she will make herself available as and when required by the investigating officer of the case. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(A)1930 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3