Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33583 (KAR)

JAI SANTHOSHI MATHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WA/1394/2026 · 2026-08-03

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322512026 NC: 2026:KHC:40403-DB WA No. 1394 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1394 OF 2026 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. JAI SANTHOSHI MATHA 9-20 A-1, VIJETHA KADEKAR GRAM PANCHAYATH KADEKAR, UDUPI - 576 103 REP. BY ITS PARTNER SANTHOSH V. SALIAN S/O. VAMAN KOTIAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 …APPELLANT (BY SRI S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT Digitally signed by K P SWETHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322512026 NC: 2026:KHC:40403-DB WA No. 1394 of 2026 2. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 3RD FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWER BENGALURU - 560 001 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES MALPE UDUPI - 576 108 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES OLD ZILLA PANCHAYATH BUILDING 1ST FLOOR, BANNANJE UDUPI - 576 101 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES BRAHMAGIRI UDUPI - 576 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., AGA) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22/01/2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P. NO.23699/2024 (GM-TEN) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION BY QUASHING THE MEMORANDUM/ORDER DATED 13/08/2024 BEARING NO.DOFTECHOF.C.Y/5/2024/1321920 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND COMMUNICATED BY LETTER DATED 19/08/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO BY ISSUING WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO ISSUE ORDER CONFIRMING THE ALLOTMENT OF TENDER IN - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322512026 NC: 2026:KHC:40403-DB WA No. 1394 of 2026 FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT PURSUANT TO THE TENDER-CUM- AUCTION HELD ON 30/10/2023 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application, I.A.No.1/2026, the same is allowed and the delay of 67 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 22.01.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court in W.P.No.23699/2024 (GM-TEN). 3. In the said writ petition, the appellant challenged the memorandum dated 13.08.2024 issued by the Directorate of Fisheries, Bengaluru, cancelling the Tender cum Auction process in respect of immovable property measuring 700 square meters in Survey No.262/1C1 A1 of Kodavoor Village, Udupi District. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322512026 NC: 2026:KHC:40403-DB WA No. 1394 of 2026 4. The appellant is a partnership firm and had participated in the bidding process pursuant to a notification dated 09.10.2023 for allotment of land for building and operating an ice-plant and refrigeration center in Survey No.262/1C1&1 of Kodavuru Village, Malpe. 5. There is no dispute that the appellant had offered the best bid. The appellant has also produced a letter dated 30.10.2023 issued by the Assistant Director of Fisheries to the Deputy Director of Fisheries indicating that the appellant was a successful tenderer for the allotment of the plot was 700 square meters on a lease for 20 years. However, we find that there is no communication accepting the appellant's bid and therefore, the contract did not come into existence. 6. The authorities cancelled the tender on the ground that it was contrary to the guidelines dated 25.08.2015, which set out the norms for allotment of sites for various purposes at fishing harbours, fish-landing centres and fish- curing yards. In terms of the said guidelines, the sites intended for cold storage unit could be allotted only to the following three entities: 1) Karnataka Fisheries - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322512026 NC: 2026:KHC:40403-DB WA No. 1394 of 2026 Development Corporation; 2) District Fish Marketing Federations and 3) Local Fishermen's Co-operative Societies. 7. The learned Single Judge had also noted that apart from the aforesaid reason, the tender was also cancelled for the reason that prior permission of the Directorate of Fisheries was not obtained and the tender notification was not published in the local edition. 8. It is not necessary for this court to examine the merits of the decision to cancel the tender notification in any detail. More particularly, since the appellant does not dispute the guidelines dated 25.08.2015, which were invoked and were applicable. The said guidelines restrict the entities that are eligible for allotment of such sites. The scope of examination is confined to determining whether the decision to cancel the tender notification is arbitrary, capricious or for ulterior purposes. In the present case, there is no reason for the court to accept that the decision to cancel the tender process not bonafide for the reasons as stated above. 9. In view of the above, we find no ground to interfere with the impugned judgment. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322512026 NC: 2026:KHC:40403-DB WA No. 1394 of 2026 10. The pending interlocutory application stands disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE KPS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27