CWP-21603-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 CWP-21603-2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 Nakshatar Singh Sohal …Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Himanshu Malik, Senior Panel Counsel for respondent no.1/ Union of India TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s legal notice dated 15.11.2025, Annexure P-12, by passing a speaking order, and thereupon take appropriate action against four of his insurance agents for concealment of material facts. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was working as Development Officer in Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) since 1997, and the aforesaid insurance agents were working under him. He further submitted that two of those terminated their spouse agency, while the other two terminated their relative agency. Consequently, the petitioner failed to get the PAYAL 2026.07.24 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-21603-2026 -2- requisite financial appraisal for continuation in service, and was compelled to seek voluntary retirement in 2025. 3. Considering the submissions, this Court finds no ground to entertain the petition and/or issue the directions prayed for. The dispute is purely personal, inter se the petitioner and his former agents, for which he can avail remedies with the Department, or under the private law, if so advised. 4. Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies aforementioned. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 17.07.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2026.07.24 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment