Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33561 (MAD)

Tata Capital Ltd v. M Suresh Kumar

Arb Appln/212/2026 · 2026-06-11

K Kumaresh Babu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb Appln No. 212 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Arb Appln No. 212 of 2026 Tata Capital Ltd 6A - Dr. Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. M Suresh Kumar 5 177 Periyar Cross Street, Kalagnar Karunanithi Nagar, Pammadukulam Post, Redhills, Land Mark Near Annai Mahal, Tiruvallur, Chennai 600 048 Tamil Nadu. M.Suresh Kumar Emp.No.4539 (122900) in M/s.Ashok Leyland Foundry Division, Ennore Express Highway, Near Bus Stop, Ernavoor, Chennai 600 057. 2. Ashok Leyland Foundry Division represented by its Authorized Officer, Payroll Department Ennore Express Highway, Near Bus stop, Ernavoor, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Arbitration Application file to direct the Respondent to furnish security for a sum of Rs.6,54,716/- within the time stipulated by this Honble Court failing which directing the Garnishee to withhold an amount of Rs.6,54,716/- from and out of the salary payable to the Respondent who being __________ Page1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 212 of 2026 employed vide Emoloyee code No.4539 (122900) and deposit the same to the credit of this application and deposit the same to the credit of this application. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.K.Vanan For Respondent(s): No appearance ORDER The present Application has been filed to direct the Respondent to furnish security for a sum of Rs.6,54,716/- within the time stipulated by this Hon’ble Court failing which directing the Garnishee to withhold an amount of Rs.6,54,716/- from and out of the salary payable to the Respondent who being employed vide Emoloyee code No.4539 (122900) and deposit the same to the credit of this application and deposit the same to the credit of this application. 2. The private notice that was served on the first respondent had been served, as found in the tracking sheet that has been placed before this Court indicating “the item had been delivered”. The first respondent name is also printed in the cause list, in spite of which he had failed to furnish security as ordered by this Court in its order dated 13.02.2026. 3. In such view of the matter, the present application is ordered as prayed for. No costs. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GBA __________ Page2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 212 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. GBA Arb Appln No. 212 of 2026 11-06-2026 __________ Page3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis