Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33547 (PAT)

Rajendra Institute of Education and Social Welfare v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/2581/2026 · 2026-02-18

Rajesh Kumar Verma, Sudhir Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2581 of 2026 ====================================================== Rajendra Institute of Education and Social Welfare, a society having its registered office at Halimpur, P.O. Dumari Kala, P.S. Majorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi, Bihar, PIN- 843315, through its authorized representative Abhishek Kumar, Male, Age about- 49 Years, Son of Jitendra Narayan Sinha, Resident of Flat No. 103. Pratima Regency, Ranjan Path, Gola Road, Danapur, Patna-801503. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-01. 2. The Secretary, Youth Employment and Skill Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Mission Director, Bihar Skill Development Mission, Department of Labour Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna -01 ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Additional Advocate General (4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 2 18-02-2026 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The following reliefs have been sought for by the petitioner in the present writ application: Patna High Court CWJC No.2581 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/4 “1 a) For issuance of Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Letter No. BSDM/ Domain-108/2025/2602 dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure P/16) passed by Respondent No. 3 wherein the Petitioner company has been blacklisted for next two years without considering the facts and circumstances of the case. b) For any other relief or reliefs which the petitioner may be found entitles to in the facts and circumstances of the case.’ 3. The show-cause issued to the petitioner is Annexure-P/12, which is as follows:- “BSDM/Domain/106/2025-1548 fcgkj ljdkj Je lalk/ku foHkkx fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku izs’kd] euh’k “kadj fe”ku funs”kd] fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku] fcgkj] iVukA lsok esa] Rajendra Institute of Educational and Social Welfare, At-Halimpur, P.O.- Dumari Kala, Via-Barharwa, Dist.- Sitamarhi, Pin-843315, Bihar iVuk] fnukad& 11&07&25 fo’k;& vkids laLFkk ds }kjk lapkfyr izf”k{k.k dsUnzksa esa ikbZ xbZ vfu;ferrk ds dkj.k laLFkk dks dkyh lwph esa Mkyus ds laca/k esa Li’Vhdj.kA egk”k;] mijksDr fo’k; ds laca/k esa dguk gS fd vkids laLFkk ds }kjk Patna High Court CWJC No.2581 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/4 lapkfyr izf”k{k.k dsUnzksa esa mifLFkfr esa xM+cM+h dh xbZA ;g ,d xaHkhj vfu;ferrk ,oa foRrh; ykHk ds mn~ns”; ls fd;k x;k QthZokM+k gSA vr,o RFP ds dafMdk 6.4 esa of.kZr “While the primary objective is to facilitate TPs in achievement of targets, but the TPs can default for Corrupt or Fraudulent Practices. First level of safeguard against such default by TP is continuous monitoring and consultative system which is already in place right till the district level. Notices shall be issued to the TPs regarding deficiencies detected at various stages. However, even after notice and reminder(s), if a TP does not take remedial measure: a major step may be taken which might lead to blacklisting of the TP” ds vk/kkj ij vkids laLFkku dks 02 o’kksZa ds fy, dkyh lwph esa D;ksa ugha Mkyk tk,A mDr ds laca/k esa Li’Vhdj.k ,d lIrkg ds vUnj lefiZr djsaA fo”oklHkktu ( (euh’k “kadj) fe”ku funs”kd fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”kuA” 4. Upon bare perusal of the show-cause, it appears that the notice is vague. No specific reasons are indicated, nor is any particular charge alleged against the petitioner. Subsequently, a final order was passed vide Annexure-P/16 dated 27.11.2025. It is noted that neither the show-cause nor the order under challenge specifies the reasons for blacklisting the petitioner. 5. In view of above, order dated 27.11.2025 is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, who shall issue a fresh show-cause notice granting the petitioner liberty to file a reply thereto and, if Patna High Court CWJC No.2581 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 4/4 necessary, afford a personal hearing to the petitioner before passing a final order in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed. 7. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U