- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010470502026 NC: 2026:KHC:40596 WP No. 21389 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.21389 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O LATE RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT MARALAYYANAKOPPALU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU-570 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HUNSUR SUB-DIVISSION, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010470502026 NC: 2026:KHC:40596 WP No. 21389 of 2026 HUNSUR, MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. 4. THE TAHSILDAR HUNSUR TALUK, HUNSUR MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. 5. SRI. JAVARANAYAKA S/O LATE JAVARANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT HOSAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. 6. SMT. REKHAMMA W/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT MARALAYYANAKOPPALU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. 7. SRI. MOHANARAJA S/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT MARALAYYANAKOPPALU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. 8. SRI. NAVEENA M. S/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT MARALAYYANAKOPPALU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010470502026 NC: 2026:KHC:40596 WP No. 21389 of 2026 MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHALLENGING THE ORDER DATED 06/02/2024 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RP NO.65/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE - 'A'. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 06.02.2024 passed by respondent No. 2-Deputy Commissioner, produced at Annexure-A. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010470502026 NC: 2026:KHC:40596 WP No. 21389 of 2026 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the material on record, it is evident that the mutation has been effected in favour of the private respondents on the basis of the registered Sale Deed dated 04.07.1995. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that no interference is called for in the impugned order. 5. However, it is open to the petitioner to establish her right, title, and interest over the subject property in a manner known to law before the competent Civil Court. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19