Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
18.08.2026
Court No.39
DL/Item No.– 34
ALLOWED
[Milan] In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side
CRM (A) 2071 of 2026
In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; filed in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 2021 of 2025 dated 10.12.2025 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. -And- In the matter of:
SAYED HOSSAIN @ SAYED SK
Mr. Md. Wasim Akram, Mr. Minhaz S. Islam ….for the Petitioner
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, Mr. Somnath Adhikary
….for the State
1. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of the statement of the co-accused. He further submits that another accused person, namely, Jakir, Sk. @ Jakir Hossain was allowed anticipatory bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM (A) 741 of 2026. 2. The present petitioner is also standing on the same footing. He prays for anticipatory bail on any terms and conditions. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 2
4. Having heard the learned counsels for the respective parties and on perusal of the materials available on record as well as the case diary, this Court finds that nothing has been recovered from his possession, no call details record or nexus has been found during the investigation. Furthermore, he is also standing on the same footing as the co-accused person, whose anticipatory bail has been granted by the Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court.There is also no prior antecedent against the present petitioner as per the Memo of Evidence submitted by Kaliachak P.S.
5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Court also extends the same privilege and grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, SAYED HOSSAIN @ SAYED SK is allowed. 7. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 8.
In the event the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 9. The application being CRM (A) 2071 of 2026 for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. 3
10. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. 11. Concerned Department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)