Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
21.08.2026 23 Court No. 05 (DL) (Suvendu Mukherjee)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (APPELLATE SIDE)
WPA 19977 of 2026
Sk. Isahak –Versus – The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Achintya Kr. Banerjee
Ms. Indumouli Banerjee
….for the petitioner
Ms. Sudipa Banerjee
Ms. Runu Mukherjee
…for the State respondents
1) Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2) Learned advocate representing petitioner alleges overt action on the part of some police personnel who are raiding petitioner’s residence in civil dress. Prayer is made for directing police authorities not to raid petitioner’s residence and not to harass petitioner and his family members. 3) However on query being posed to learned advocate representing petitioner whether any complaint is lodged before concerned police authorities alleging overt action/harassment by certain police personnel, this Court does not get satisfactory reply. Nothing is shown that any complaint is lodged before concerned police authorities. There is also no averment in writ
2 petition relating to identity of persons who are harassing petitioner and his family members. In absence of necessary particulars, present writ petition is not interfered with and same stands dismissed. 4) However, this order shall not preclude petitioner to take steps in accordance with law, if so advised. 5) Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)