Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3353 (RAJ)

VARUN KUMAR SON OF SHRI RAMESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3663/2023 · 2026-04-21

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16789] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3663/2023 Varun Kumar Son of Shri Ramesh, Aged About 19 Years, Resi- dent of Pali, Police Station Suroth, Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Asharam Son of Shri Rajan, Aged About 43 Years, Resi- dent of Police, Police Station Suroth, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sogarwal for Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/04/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. 2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long, [2026:RJ-JP:16789] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3663/2023] on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No.216/2023, registered with the Police Station Suroth, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC read with Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 4. At the outset learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court, that after investigation no prima facie case was found to be proved against the petitioner-Varun Kumar, hence, Final Report (Negative) was proposed. Hence, under changed circumstances the instant petition has become infructuous. 5. Considering the above, the instant petition is rendered as infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dismissed. 6. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of instant petition and for recall of this order in case any cause of action/grievance still survives. 7. A copy of the factual report dated 20.04.2026 furnished by SHO of Police Station Suroth, District Karauli is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam/13