Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33526 (CHH)

ASHISH SHRIVAS ALIAS SHANIRAM v. MUNIB ANSARI

MAC/693/2025 · 2026-08-16

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010109732025 2026:CGHC:36624 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 693 of 2025 1 - Ashish Shrivas Alias Shaniram S/o Munni Shrivas Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 48/57, Shivghat, Sarkanda, Ward No. 48, Thana Sarkanda, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Appellant versus 1 - Munib Ansari S/o Almuddin Ansari Aged About 35 Years R/o Shahpur, Thana Chainpur, District Palamu, Jharkhand (Driver Of Vehicle Car No. Cg 13 La 5475). 2 - Jasbir Kaur Alag S/o Baljeet Singh Alag R/o Ward No. 11, Hig 26, Arya Colony, Tifra, Thana Sirgitti, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Owner Of Vehicle Car No. Cg 13 La 5475). 3 - Branch Manager United India Insurance Company Limited. Through Its Branch Office Lic Building 1st Floor, Magar Para Road, Thana Civil Line, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Insurer Of Vehicle Car No. Cg 13 La 5475). --- Respondents For Appellant : None For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Abhishek Nirala, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. P.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2026.08.18 19:12:31 +0530 2 17/08/2026 1. On earlier occasions also, i.e. on 28/03/2025 and today also no one appears, nor any representation was made on behalf of the appellant, even when the case is called out in the second round of hearing. 2. In view of above circumstance, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Arpan