UMA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/2945/2026 · 2026-03-16
Surya Partap Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3352 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3352 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-2945
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 120
UMA KUMARI
STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PARTA
directions to the respondent
2.
the petitione P-5) before the respondent No. stipulated time.
3.
2945-2026 (O&M) 8587
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
UMA KUMARI & ANR.
VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA
Mr. Vikram Pundir, Advocate for Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate
Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to respondents No.4 and 5.
The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioner No.1 has filed the representation before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time.
Notice of motion to respondents No.1 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-2945-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.03.2026
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Vikram Pundir, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 12.03.2026 (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a to respondents No.1 to 3.
(O&M) 2026
.....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.17 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-2945
upon the State
5.
hereby disposed of with a direction to representation within a period of 15 days from is further security to that any observation is not being made by this Court perception to the petitioner authority of assessment the issue of Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2945-2026 (O&M) 8587
Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab upon the State is hereby dispensed with.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order further directed that the petitioners shall security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is that any observation is not being made by this Court perception to the petitioners or the validity of their marriage authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make assessment of the threat perception to the petitioner the issue of providing adequate security to
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2
Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Hence service of notice
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order of receipt of copy of instant order shall be provided requisite safety and life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre or the validity of their marriage. The police District shall be at liberty to make an independent to the petitioners, and take a decision security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No
Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is decide the by passing a speaking order of receipt of copy of instant order. It safety and clarified with regard to threat . The police independent and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.17 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document