Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33518 (PNJ)

RAJIT SETH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/12305/2026 · 2026-07-23

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12305-2026 [1] 114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12305-2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 Rajit Seth ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. In the present writ petition, following prayers have been made:- “The Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue the allotment letter in the name of petitioner, as the petitioner has completed all the formalities as per the Act and further as directed by the respondents from time to time, i.e., submission of indemnity bond, transfer fee etc. And/Or To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing that the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice submitted by the petitioner vide reference No.2/2026, dated 03.02.2026 (P-12), vide which, all the details have been clarified and specifically mentioned that all the formalities as per the Statute and demanded by the respondents time to time, have already been completed within the time bound manner, but the action of the respondents is totally illegal and against the provisions of the Statute. And/or To issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble High Court may deems fit and proper in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case.” PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.24 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-12305-2026 [2] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the plot in question is not transferred in favour of the petitioner in spite of petitioner having complied with the terms and conditions of transfer. It is submitted that for the redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has given legal notice dated 03.02.2026 (Annexure P-12). It is further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram is directed to decide the same in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the said legal notice dated 03.02.2026 would be considered and decided by the Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram, within a period of three months from today and in case the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram to consider and decide legal notice dated 03.02.2026 by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from today. In case, Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram finds that the pleas raised by the petitioner are meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner expeditiously. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 23.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.24 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document