IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2184 of 2026 ====================================================== Datapro Computers Pvt. Ltd. a company registered under Companies Act 1956 having its registered office at No. 9-14-1, Flat No. 301 and 302, 2nd Floor, Kotu Empire, VIP Road, CBMC Compound, Siripuram Visakhapatnam, PIN-530003, Andhra Pradesh, India through its authorized representative Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, Male, age about 38 years, Son of Ram Suresh Tiwary, Resident of B-401, Laxmi Uma Plaza, East Lohanipur, Kadamkuhan, Patna, Phulwari, Patna, Kadamkuan, Bihar-800003. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-01. 2. The Secretary, Youth Employment and Skill Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Mission Director, Bihar Skill Development Mission, Department of Labour Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-01. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, GP-5 Mr. Dhuvendra Kumar, AC to GP-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 2 13-02-2026 Following is the relief sought for in the present writ application:- “a) For issuance of Writ in nature of Patna High Court CWJC No.2184 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/4 Certiorari quashing the Letter No. BSDM/ Domain- 108/2025/2605 dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure P/16 passed by Respondent No. 3 wherein the Petitioner company has been blacklisted for next two years without considering the facts and circumstances of the case. b) For any other relief or reliefs which the petitioners may be found entitles to in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. The show-cause issued to the petitioner is Annexure-P/12, which is as follows:- “ BSDM/Domain/108/2025-1550 fcgkj ljdkj Je lalk/ku foHkkx fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku izs’kd] euh’k “kadj fe”ku funs”kd fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku] fcgkj] iVukA lsok esa] Datapro Computers Pvt. Ltd. No-9-14-1, Flat No.-301 & 302, 2nd Floor, Kotu Empire VIP Road CBM Compound Siripuram Visakhapatnam -530003, Andhra Pradesh iVuk] fnukad& 11&07&25 fo’k;%& vkids laLFkk ds }kjk lapkfyr izf”k{k.k dsUnzksa esa ikbZ xbZ vfu;ferrk ds dkj.k laLFkk dks dkyh lwph esa Mkyus ds laca/k esa Li’Vhdj.kA egk”k;] mijksDr fo’k; ds laca/k esa dguk gS fd vkids laLFkk ds }kjk lapkfyr izf”k{k.k dsUnzksa esa mifLFkfr esa xM+cM+h dh xbZA ;g ,d xaHkhj vfu;ferrk ,oa fofRr; ykHk ds mn~ns”; ls fd;k x;k QthZokM+k gSA vr,o RFP ds dafMdk 6-4 esa of.kZr “ While the primary objective is to facilitate TPs in achievement of targets, but the Patna High Court CWJC No.2184 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 3/4 TPs can default for Corrupt or Fraudulent Practices. First level of safeguard against such default by TP is continuous monitoring and consultative system which is already in place right till the district level. Notices shall be issued to the TPs regarding deficiencies detected at various stages. However, even after notice and reminder(s), if a TP does not take remedial measure; a major step may be taken which might lead to blacklisting of the TP” ds vk/kkj ij vkids laLFkku dks 02 o’kksZa ds fy, dkyh lwph esa D;ksa ugha Mkyk tk,A mDr ds laca/k esa Li’Vhdj.k ,d lIrkg ds vUnj lefiZr djsaA fo”oklHkktu g0@& ¼euh’k “kadj½ fe”ku funs”kd fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”kuA” 3. Upon bare perusal of the show-cause, it appears that the notice is vague. No specific reasons are indicated, nor is any particular charge alleged against the petitioner. Subsequently, a final order was passed vide Annexure-P/16 dated 27.11.2025. It is noted that neither the show-cause nor the order under challenge specifies the reasons for blacklisting the petitioner. 4. In view of above, order dated 27.11.2025 is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, who shall issue a fresh show-cause notice granting the petitioner liberty to file a reply thereto and, if necessary, afford a personal hearing to the petitioner before passing a final order in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed. Patna High Court CWJC No.2184 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 4/4 6. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. Sachin/- (Sudhir Singh, J) (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U