CRM-M-26830 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 297 Parveen and others State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) under Section Bhupani, District Faridabad, Haryana arising therefrom, on the basis of arrived at between the parties. 2. learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their stateme regard to compromise. 3. learned Judicial Statement of Investigating Station Bhupani, Faridabad 26830-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Parveen and others VERSUS State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kshitij Bharati, AAG, Haryana Mr. Rohit Kumar Rana, Advocate and Ms. Kajal Chauhan, Advocate for **** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. under Sections 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad, Haryana, and all subsequent therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. On 13.05.2026, this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their stateme regard to compromise. In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad tement of Investigating officer- ASI Vijnder Kumar, No.643, Police Bhupani, Faridabad, was also recorded 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26830-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:23.07.2026 …Petitioners ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL , Advocate for the petitioners. ti, AAG, Haryana. Rohit Kumar Rana, Advocate and Advocate for respondents No.2 to 6. quashing of FIR No.33 dated 05.03.2026, 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, Police Station and all subsequent proceedings compromise dated 02.05.2026 said to be , this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before Faridabad, on 20.05.2026/25.05.2026. ASI Vijnder Kumar, No.643, Police recorded on 25.05.2026. Learned (O&M) .2026 s espondents , 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, Police Station proceedings said to be , this Court directed the parties to appear before nts with of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before . ASI Vijnder Kumar, No.643, Police . Learned KAPIL 2026.07.23 19:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26830 Judicial Magistrate Ist satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. submitted: 26830-2026 (O&M) Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad, has submitted satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. The relevant part of the report “1. Total number of persons found involved as accused in the dispute/FIR Report: As per statement of IO, there are only five accused persons namely Parveen, Umesh, Pawan, Suman and Babita in the present FIR. 2. Number of complainant/victims(s) Report: As per statement of IO, there is one complainant namely Chaman Lal & four other victims namely Ekta, Santosh, Kamla and Rajeev in the present case. 3. Whether all the accused and complainan party to the compromise and signed the same. Report: Yes, all the accused and complainant/victims(s) are party to the compromise. 4. In case, any affected person (accused or complainant) is left out or not arrayed as party in the quashing pet before High Court, detail whereof; Report: As per statement of IO, all the effected persons (complainant/victims and accused persons) are arrayed as party in the quashing petition before Hon'ble High Court. 2 has submitted his report recording satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without The relevant part of the report as under has been Total number of persons found involved as accused in the As per statement of IO, there are only five accused persons namely Parveen, Umesh, Pawan, Suman in the present FIR. Number of complainant/victims(s) As per statement of IO, there is one complainant namely Chaman Lal & four other victims namely Ekta, Santosh, Kamla and Rajeev in the present Whether all the accused and complainant/victims are party to the compromise and signed the same. Yes, all the accused and complainant/victims(s) are party to the compromise. In case, any affected person (accused or complainant) is left out or not arrayed as party in the quashing petition before High Court, detail whereof; As per statement of IO, all the effected persons (complainant/victims and accused persons) are arrayed as party in the quashing petition before Hon'ble High Court. report recording satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without as under has been Total number of persons found involved as accused in the As per statement of IO, there are only five accused persons namely Parveen, Umesh, Pawan, Suman As per statement of IO, there is one complainant namely Chaman Lal & four other victims namely Ekta, Santosh, Kamla and Rajeev in the present t/victims are Yes, all the accused and complainant/victims(s) In case, any affected person (accused or complainant) is ition As per statement of IO, all the effected persons (complainant/victims and accused persons) are arrayed as party in the quashing petition before KAPIL 2026.07.23 19:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26830 4. to 6 have not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. 5. Judgment of th and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others” petition is allowed. 26830-2026 (O&M) 5. Whether any accused has been delcared as offender/person or any such proceedings against him/her have been initiated or pending adjudication. Report: As per statement of IO, neither any accused person has been delcared as a proclaimed offender/person nor any such proceedings agains been initiated or pending adjudication. 6. Report of the Court whether compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercoin or undue influence. Report: From the statements of the parties suffered before the court, it appears that t effected is for the amicable settlement of the dispute and has been effected without any external pressure, undue influence, coercion or force and is a valid/genuine compromise. 7. Any other aspect relevant to the present case. Report: No.” Learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondent not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others” petition is allowed. 3 Whether any accused has been delcared as a proclaimed offender/person or any such proceedings against him/her have been initiated or pending adjudication. As per statement of IO, neither any accused person has been delcared as a proclaimed offender/person nor any such proceedings against any of them has been initiated or pending adjudication. Report of the Court whether compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercoin or undue influence. From the statements of the parties suffered before the court, it appears that the compromise so effected is for the amicable settlement of the dispute and has been effected without any external pressure, undue influence, coercion or force and is a valid/genuine compromise. Any other aspect relevant to the present case. and learned counsel for respondents No.2 not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others” (2012) 10 SCC 303, the a proclaimed offender/person or any such proceedings against him/her As per statement of IO, neither any accused person has been delcared as a proclaimed offender/person t any of them has Report of the Court whether compromise is genuine, From the statements of the parties suffered before he compromise so effected is for the amicable settlement of the dispute and has been effected without any external pressure, undue influence, coercion or force and is No.2 not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and Hon’ble Supreme Court in , the KAPIL 2026.07.23 19:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26830 6. 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad, Haryana quashed qua the 7. 23.07.2026 Kapil 26830-2026 (O&M) Consequently, FIR No.33 dated 05.03.2026, under Sections 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad, Haryana, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed qua the petitioners, on the basis of compromise dated Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : 4 FIR No.33 dated 05.03.2026, under Sections 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, Police Station Bhupani, District and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are compromise dated 02.05.2026. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No FIR No.33 dated 05.03.2026, under Sections 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, Police Station Bhupani, District and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) KAPIL 2026.07.23 19:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document