1 CGHC010254282026 2026:CGHC:36759-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 359 of 2026 1 - Ashutosh Dicruz S/o Joseph Dicruz, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Behind Pandey Dairy, Mandi Kanpa, Lodhi Para, Raipur, P.S. Mowa, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Akansha Dicruz D/o Joseph Dicruz, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Behind Pandey Dairy, Mandi Kanpa, Lodhi Para, Raipur, P.S. Mowa, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Commissioner Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Station House Officer, P.S. Ganj, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - ABC W/o XYZ, D/o DEF, Aged About 23 Years, Through SHO, P.S. Ganj, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Ms. Shruti Dewangan, Advocate. For State : Mr. Saumya Rai, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 18.08.2026 1. Heard Ms. Shruti Dewangan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Saumya Rai, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate appearing for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking the Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.08.25 22:27:37 +0530 2 following relief(s):- “10.1 Call for entire records pursuant to crime number 171 of 2026 registered at P.S. Ganj, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) 10.2 Allow the petition and quash the impugned FIR and consequential proceedings initiated against the petitioners pursuant to impugned FIR bearing crime no. 171/2026 for the offence punishable U/s 64 (2)(m), 308(2), 35 (2) and 3(5) of BNS registered at P.S.- Ganj, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) 10.3 Any other relief or reliefs which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be kindly granted.” 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents No.1 and 2 submits that in the present case investigation has been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted in the concerned Court on 04.08.2026 and in the present petition only FIR has been challenged. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy for quashing of the charge sheet. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to law if aggrieved by the charge-sheet, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil