SALEEM ALIAS MOHAMMAD SALEEM S/O SAHRUDEEN v. RASHEED KHAN SON OF SULEMAN,
CMA/2900/2025 · 2026-03-19
Sandeep Taneja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 335 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 335 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11773] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2900/2025 Saleem Alias Mohammad Saleem S/o Sahrudeen, Aged About 15 Years, Applicant Claimant Is Minor Through Natural Guardian Father Sahrudeen Both Resident Of Village Niwali, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Appellant Versus
1. Rasheed Khan Son Of Suleman, Resident Of Village Bardod Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.) Driver Vehicle Motorcycle Number-Rj 02-Ks 7904.
2. Mehboob Ali Son Of Ali Mohammad, Resident Of Village Dohali Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.) Owner Vehicle Motorcycle Number Rj 02-Ks 7904.
3. Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited, Peninsula Business Park, Tower A. 15Th Floor Gk Marg Lower Parel Mumbai-13 Insurer Vehicle Motorcycle No. Rj 02-Ks790 ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ram Sharan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandradeep Singh Jodha with Mr. Vikas Bana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order 19/03/2026
1. This appeal has been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the appellant-claimant (to be referred as
"the appellant") against the judgment and award dated 20.03.2025 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Alwar, Rajasthan in Claim Petition No.29/2018 (CIS No.39/2018), whereby the claim petition filed by the appellant was partly allowed by awarding total compensation of Rs.1,12,776/- along with interest @ 6% per annum in favour of the appellant.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent No.3- Insurance Company jointly submit that during
[2026:RJ-JP:11773] (2 of 3) [CMA-2900/2025] the pendency of this appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and accordingly a settlement has been arrived at between them by way of compromise.
3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by the learned counsel for both the parties has been placed on record on
17.03.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for both the parties submit that they are duly authorized by their respective parties to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under:-
"1. An additional lump-sum amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Three Lakh only) (including interest) shall be paid to the claimant by insurance company by depositing the same before tribunal concerns within 2 months from today i.e. from date of compromise order in full and final settlement of appeal with claimants. The said enhancement amount shall be disbursed to the claimants through saving bank account.
2. In case, the insurance company fails to deposit the said amount within 2 months from today i.e. from date of compromise order, claimants shall be entitled for interest at 6% PA from the date of compromise order, till payment is made.
3. The appeal is agreed to be disposed of in terms of this compromise."
4.
Learned counsel for both the parties jointly pray that the present appeal be disposed of in light of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and memo of compromise, it is directed that Insurance Company shall pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- in all, to the appellant, in addition to the amount already awarded by the learned Tribunal within a period of two months, failing which the above amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum.
[2026:RJ-JP:11773] (3 of 3) [CMA-2900/2025]
6. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and award dated 20.03.2025 is modified. The terms of memo of compromise shall be treated as an integral part of this order.
7. The instant appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
8. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /28