Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 335 (JHR)

ISAD ANSARI ALIAS ISHAD ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./79/2026 · 2026-03-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:6401 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 79 of 2026 ------ Isad Ansari @ Ishad Ansari, aged about 24 years, S/o –Tufan Mian, R/o Village –Kumgara, P.O.+P.S. –Palojori, District - Deoghar. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 11.03.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.146 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(2)(b)/111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 66B/66C/66D and 84C of the I.T. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cybercrime. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –22 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case because of the only allegation against him that one mobile phone with sim card has been recovered from the petitioner which was used in creation of several e-wallets. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.11.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar, in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.146 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 11.03.2026 Sonu/