Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33497 (CHH)

KAMAL NARAYAN RUNGTA v. RAMESH CHANDRA

MCC/787/2026 · 2026-08-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010307022026 2026:CGHC:37737 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 787 of 2026 Kamal Narayan Rungta S/o Late Gajadhar Prasad Rungta Aged About 75 Years Resident Of Ganjpara, Durg, Tehsil And District - Durg (Chhattisgarh) ... Applicant versus 1 - Ramesh Chandra S/o Madanlal Resident Of Ramadhin Marg, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Ram Avtar S/o Madanlal Resident Of Ramadhin Marg, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Mahendra Kumar S/o Madanlal Resident Of Ramadhin Marg, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicants (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Ms. Yashasvi Singhi, Advocate For State : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 24.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the defects pointed out by the Registry have already been cured. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.08.25 10:24:18 +0530 2 2. This MCC has been preferred by the applicant seeking restoration of WPC No.1624/2022. The said writ petition came to be dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 18.06.2026 as neither the applicant nor counsel appeared when the matter was called for hearing. The applicant has explained the circumstances which led to the non-appearance on the said date and has prayed for restoration of the writ petition to its original file. 3. Upon due consideration of the grounds urged in the application and being satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for the applicant’s non-appearance, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice require that the writ petition be restored. 4. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Resultantly, WPC No.1624/2022 is restored to its original number subject to deposit of costs of Rs.2,000/- payable to the High Court Bar Association Library Fund. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh