Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
07/08/2026 D/L – 54 Court No.35 S. Kundu
C.R.M.(A) 851 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Kandi P.S. Case No. 73 of 2026 dated 24/02/2026 under sections 120B/406/409/417/468/471 of the IPC. In the matter of: Edward Guria …Petitioner. Mr. Pradip Kr. Chatterjee Ms. Priyanka Saha …for the petitioner. Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das Mr. Satarup Purkayastha …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent to that effect draws the attention of the Court that the No Due Certificate was a forged certificate and so far as the final order which has been passed by the bank authority for declaring the act and action of the borrower as fraud do not implicate the present petitioner. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary as well as the other materials on record, on an assessment of the same, I am of the view that the fixed deposit receipts which were kept as a collateral in respect of cash credit account was returned to the borrower without any authority. The same prima facie establishes the complicity of the petitioner. Consequently, no case for
2
anticipatory bail is made out so far as the present petitioner is concerned. Accordingly, CRM(A) 851 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence filed by the State is taken on record. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)