Vishalachi v. K.Kuppayee (Died) ,Periasamy (Died), 1.K.Venkatachalam
SA/362/2026 · 2026-06-10
S Sounthar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33495 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33495 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SA No. 362 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR SA No. 362 of 2026 and CMP No.12337 of 2026 Vishalachi,W/o. Late Kuppusamy, No.2/6, Kandampatti and Post, Salem Taluk and District. ..Appellant(s) Vs K.Kuppayee (Died) , Periasamy (Died),
1. K.Venkatachalam, W/o. Late Kuppusamy Pillai, Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District.
2. K.Arumugam, S/o. Late Kuppusamy Pillai, Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District.
3. K.Rajagopal, S/o. Late Kuppusamy Pillai, Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District.
4. Janaki, W/o. Late K.Periasamy Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District.
5. Thayumanavan, S/o. Late Periasamy Kandampatti Village and Post, __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA No. 362 of 2026 Salem Taluk and District.
6. Vivekanandan, S/o. Late Periasamy Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District.
7. Meenambikai, D/o. Late Periasamy Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District.
8. Manickam, S/o. Late Periasamy Thiruvannamalai.
9. Jeeva Jyoti, S/o. Late Periasamy Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District. 10.Prema, D/o. Late Periasamy Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District. 11.Vedanayaki, D/o. Late Periasamy Kandampatti Village and Post, Salem Taluk and District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Second Appeal is filed to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 14.12.2007 in As NO. 62 of 2007 passed by the District Judge, Salem, Confirming the Judgment and decree dated 06.02.2007 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem in OS No. 867 of 1995 . For Appellant(s): Mr. C.Emalias __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA No. 362 of 2026 JUDGMENT When the matter was listed on 08.06.2026, there was no representation for the appellant in the morning as well afternoon. Therefore, in order to give opportunity to the appellant, Registry was directed to list the matter on 10.06.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’ .
2. Today, the second appeal is listed under the caption ‘ for dismissal’. However, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. In view of the above, this second appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MST To
1. The District Judge, Salem.
2. The Subordinate Judge, Salem. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA No. 362 of 2026 S.SOUNTHAR, J. MST SA No. 362 of 2026 10-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis