20.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 798. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (NDPS) 1704 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 28 of 2026 dated 11th January, 2026 under Section 21(C)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of : Suman Sk ……Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Avik Ghosh Ms. Ankusha Ghosh ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Mr. Rishav Singh ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioner is in custody for more than 7 months. Charge sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court and the prosecution has relied upon 16 witnesses in order to prove its case. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the complicity of the petitioner as well as the Chemical Examiner’s Report. The Chemical Examiner’s Report do not aid the present petitioner. Consequently, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is 2 attracted as 327 Gms. of Heroin were recovered. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, learned Trial court would split up the trial of the case after exhausting the process of law and overcome the stage of consideration of charges. After the charges are framed, learned Trial Court within a period of 60 days would complete the evidence of the independent seizure list witnesses. Petitioner will renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses are completed. At this stage, CRM (NDPS) 1704 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)