LALJI YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/15351/2026 · 2026-05-06
Saurabh Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3349 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3349 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 15351 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State.
2. This application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 07.08.2025 along with cognizance/summoning
order dated 05.02.2026 and entire proceeding of Case No.2451 of 2026 (State Vs. Lalji Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime No.284 of 2025, under Sections115(2), 352, 351(3), 110, 117(2), 131, 333, 61(2) BNS, P.S. Mubarakpur, District Azamgarh, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet along with injury report, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet and entire proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lalji Yadav And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally
disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. May 7, 2026 Vivek Kr. NA528 No. 15351 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad