IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6797 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHAURA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Lalbabu Prasad Yadav Son of Hitlal Ray Resident of Village - Gola Pakadiya Tola, Fatehpur, P.S. - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the informant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Lakhaura P.S. Case No. 229 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 76, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner has stabbed the husband of the informant by means of Barcha. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6797 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 there is also a counter version of this case but on being asked as to whether the petitioner’s side has received any injury, he could not answer it. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 24.08.2025. 5. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the informant and the learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the informant submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that two accused persons namely, Avinash Kumar and Mukesh Kumar caught the husband of the informant and this petitioner assaulted with barcha, which hit on the chest. From perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it is clear that the learned trial court has recorded that “the injury report of Lal Babu Prasad Yadav (husband of the informant) as follows: (i). A stab wound on left side chest of size 1/2”x1/4”x1/2”, (ii). HRCT of Thorax-report and plate not submitted till date and the learned trial court has also recorded that Ct+ HCRap-fracture shows fracture of left 4th & 8th ribs, left pnemothrage with massive left side hemothora, lung contusion.” 6. Learned counsel for the informant further submits that the petitioner is having direct allegation of stabbing the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6797 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 husband of the informant with barcha and the assault has caused fracture injury on the chest. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage, however the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after three months. 8. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T