Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3346 (ALL)

SHASHIKANT RAI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/499/2026 · 2026-05-06

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 499 of 2026 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to conclude the enquiry and take legal action against respondent no. 6 within a stipulated period. 2. Instructions were produced inter-alia indicating that the report has been obtained, however, further action was not indicated. 3. Today, fresh instructions have been produced inter-alia indicating that detailed inspection report dated 26.09.2025 has been produced by the Finance and Statistical Officer, Mau, wherein no wrongdoing was detected and the said report has been accepted by the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Mau. 3. In view of the above fact situation, once the enquiry has been undertaken and no wrongdoing has been found, we do not find any reason to further continue with the present Public Interest Litigation. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. May 7, 2026 nd/Sazia Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shitlesh Pandey, Shivendra Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankit Gaur, S.C. (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Shashikant Rai .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 5 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NISITH DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad