Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33453 (CAL)

MAHABUL HOQUE @ MAHABUL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/2652/2026 · 2026-08-20

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20.08.2026 Serial no. 588 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (A) 2652 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Ratua PS Cse No. 712 of 2026 dated 05.07.2026, GR No. 2349 of 2026 u/s 329(4)/351(3)/64 of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Mahabul Hoque @ Mahabul … Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourav Roy … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharjee, APP Ms. Tanusree Kr … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. State has produced the case diary. I have taken into account the statement of the victim. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2652 of 2026 is dismissed. 2 Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)