Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33451 (KAR)

MR. PRAKASH RAO, v. OMKARA ASSTS RECONSTRUCION PRIVATE LIMITED.,

WP/6216/2023 · 2026-07-31

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010146292023 NC: 2026:KHC:40287 WP No. 6216 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6216 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. PRAKASH RAO, S/O SRI APPANNA RAO AGED 72 YEARS NO. 281, 5TH MAIN ROAD MICO LAYOUT, B G ROAD, AREKERE BENGALURU 560076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH R. BHAGAT, ADVOCATE) AND: OMKARA ASSTS RECONSTRUCION PRIVATE LIMITED., (ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY) (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS OAPRL) IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF OMKARA PS06/2021-22 TRUST, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT C/515 KANAIKA ZILLION JUNCTION OF LBS ROAD AND CST ROAD, BKC ANNEXE, NEARS EQUINOX KURLA (WEST) MUMBAI 400070 AND ITS REGSITERED OFFICE AT NO 9 Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010146292023 NC: 2026:KHC:40287 WP No. 6216 of 2023 M P NAGAR, 1ST STREET KONGU NAGAR EXTENSION TIRPUR 641607 REP BY ITS AURHTOIZED OFFICER MR RAJESH B JUMANI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 3 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AVINASH B C., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 17.11.2022 PASSED BY THE HONBLE 30TH ADDL. CMM COURT AT BENGALURU IN C.MISS NO.6050/2022 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY VIDE ANNX-C BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010146292023 NC: 2026:KHC:40287 WP No. 6216 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo dated 17.04.2025 seeking to withdraw the petition. The memo reads as under: " In the above matter, the parties have settled the matter and disposed-off the property in question. Therefore, above writ petition becomes infructuous and same may be disposed-off as Settled out of Court in the interest of justice and equity". 2. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE BK