[2026:RJ-JP:16887] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4782/2022 Rishi Kumar S/o Shri Sube Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Shikshak Colony, Thana Behror, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar. ----Petitioner/Complainant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. , Jaipur. 2. Narendra Kumar Chodhary S/o T.L. Choudhary, Resident Of Block No. A-1, House No. 301, Pashmivihar, New Delhi. ----Non-Petitioners/Non-Complainant For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anisha Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 21/04/2026 ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 482 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 2 cgjksM+] ftyk vyoj nkf.Md fuxjkuh la[;k 18@2022 esa ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 28-04-2022 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh gS] ftlds }kjk fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 2 cgjksM+] ftyk vyoj us fo}ku vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV la[;k 3] cgjksM+ }kjk izdj.k la[;k 22@46,@16 _f"k dqekj cuke ujsUnz dqekj esa ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 08-10-2021 ds laca/k esa fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dj xokg ujsUnz flag 'kk[kk izca/kd dkWjiksjs'ku cSad] ubZ fnYyh o vfrfjDr 'ks"k lk{khx.k dh lk{; fjdkWMZ fd;s tkus dh vuqefr nh xbZ gSA ;kph@ifjoknh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ jgk gS fd ^^Sethuraman Versus Rajamanickam; SLP (Crl.) No. 2688-89 of 2005" esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad [2026:RJ-JP:16887] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-4782/2022] 18-03-2009 ds rgr /kkjk 311 naM izfdz;k lafgrk esa fo}ku vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV la[;k 3] cgjksM+ }kjk ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 08-10-2021 ds fo#) fuxjkuh ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gSA vr% fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 2 cgjksM+] ftyk vyoj }kjk ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 28-04-2022 dks vikLr fd;k tkosA izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd bl rdZ ls lger gSa fd bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izLrqr fofu'p; ds vk/kkj ij /kkjk 311 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 2 cgjksM+] ftyk vyoj ds varxZr iwoZ esa iks"k.kh; ugha FkhA eSaus mHk;i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA fo}ku vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV la[;k 3] cgjksM+ }kjk izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= dk varxZr /kkjk 311 naM izfdz;k lafgrk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k x;k FkkA mDr vkns'k fnukad 08-10-2021 ds fo#) fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 2 cgjksM+] ftyk vyoj ds le{k fuxjkuh ;kfpdk /kkjk 397 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA bl laca/k esa ^^Sethuraman Versus Rajamanickam; SLP (Crl.) No. 2688-89 of 2005; order dated 18.03.2009" fofu'p; ds iSjk la[;k 4 dks ;gka m)fjr fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr gksxk%& ^^4. Secondly, what was not realized was that the order passed by the Trial Court refusing to call the documents and rejecting the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C., were interlocutory orders and as such, the revision against those orders was clearly barred under Section 397(2) Cr.P.C. The Trial Court, in its common order, had clearly mentioned that the cheque was admittedly signed by the respondent/accused and the only defence that was raised, was that his signed cheques were lost and that the appellant/complainant had falsely used one such cheque. The Trial Court also recorded a finding that the [2026:RJ-JP:16887] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-4782/2022] documents were not necessary. This order did not, in any manner, decide anything finally. Therefore, both the orders, i.e., one on the application under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for production of documents and other on the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for recalling the witness, were the orders of interlocutory nature, in which case, under Section 397(2), revision was clearly not maintainable. Under such circumstances, the learned Judge could not have interfered in his revisional jurisdiction. The impugned judgment is clearly incorrect in law and would have to be set aside. It is accordingly set aside. The appeals are allowed." mijksDr fofu'p; esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fl)kar ds vuqlkj /kkjk 311 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ,d varorhZ vkns'k gS vkSj ,sls vkns'k ds fo#) /kkjk 397¼2½ naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gSA vr% fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 2 cgjksM+] ftyk vyoj }kjk nkf.Md fuxjkuh la[;k 18@2022 esa ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 28-04-2022 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj rn~uq:i mDr ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 482 naM izfdz;k lafgrk Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J KISHAN SONI /26