Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010190462021 NC: 2026:KHC:44703 RFA No. 370 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 370 OF 2021 (EJE) BETWEEN:
SRI. G.VENKATESH, S/o SRI. M. GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT No.1483, GROUND FLOOR, 17TH ‘A’ MAIN, J.P. NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA H., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.R.MAHALAKSHMI, W/o SRI. H.R.YATHIRAJ, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT No.833, 16TH MAIN,17TH CROSS, BSK II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.G. RAVIKUMAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 R/W SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:18.03.2021 PASSED IN OS.No.7256/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010190462021 NC: 2026:KHC:44703 RFA No. 370 of 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo stating that the respondent has taken physical possession of the property pending disposal of the appeal. In that view of the matter, the appeal becomes infructuous and sought to withdraw the appeal as having rendered infructuous.
2. The Memo is taken on record and accepting the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
DR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8 ct-vn