D/L80 21.08.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (A) 2695 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Onda Police Station Case No.78 of 2026 dated 01.04.2026 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/351(2)/3(5) and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Sukumar Bauri & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Soumik Ganguli Ms. Priti Barman Ms. Simika Roy. …for the petitioners. Mr. Brajesh Jha Mr. Subhendu Sinha Roy Mr. Sunil Gupta. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in connection with the present case because of previous grudge. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary. I have taken into account the nature of the injury inflicted by the petitioners with the aid of hammer. Having regard to the nature of the injury, I am not inclined to grant the benefit of 2 anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, CRM(A)2695 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)