VEERAPATHIRAN v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Palayanur
CRL OP(MD)/10278/2026 · 2026-06-05
P Dhanabal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33415 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33415 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.10278 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No.10278 of 2026
1. Veerapathiran, 261, Keezhatheru, Thanjakoor, Manamadurai, Vilathur, Sivagangai District.
2. Kodeeshwaran, 261, Keezhatheru, Thanjakoor, Manamadurai, Vilathur, Sivagangai District.
3. Mayakrishnan, 83, North Street, Thanjakoor, Manamadurai, Vilathur, Sivagangai District.
4. Sivagurunathan, 83, North Street, Thanjakoor, Manamadurai, Vilathur, Sivagangai District.
5. Tulasi Raman, No.61, North Street, Thanjakoor, Manamadurai, Vuathur, Sivagangai District.
6. Senthil, 169, East Street, Vilathur, Sivagangai District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.10278 of 2026
7. Rajasekaran, 47/1 North Street, Vilathur, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District. ... Petitioners/A1 to A7 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Palayanur Police Station, Sivagangai District. Crime No.36/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.V. Malaiyendran, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel for State of TN
(Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-38AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.36/2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A7, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2)(3), 296(b), 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No. 36 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.10278 of 2026 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the offences are bailable in nature. Hence, he prayed to dismiss this petition. 3.This Court perused the materials available on records. 4.As per the FIR, the above said offences are bailable in nature and therefore, the question of granting anticipatory bail will not arise and it is not appropriate to consider the anticipatory bail application and the same is not maintainable. 5.Accordingly,
this
Criminal
Original Petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned appropriate 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.10278 of 2026 forum by filing appropriate petition in accordance with law.
(P D B J) 05.06.2026 VSG TO 1.The Inspector of Police, Palayanur Police Station, Sivagangai District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.10278 of 2026 P. DHANABAL,J., vsg
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10278 of 2026 Date : 05/06/2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis