CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----25777 25777 25777 25777 203 ( 203 ( 203 ( 203 (3333rd rd rd rd case) case) case) case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Navneet Singla State of U.T., Chandigarh Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present Present Present Present: SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL proclamation proceedings were initiate 2. registered under Section 174 25777 25777 25777 25777----2026 2026 2026 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----25777 25777 25777 25777----2026 2026 2026 2026 Navneet Singla versus U.T., Chandigarh and another Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: July 23 July 23 July 23 July 23, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: July July July July 24 24 24 24, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate for the Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor U.T., Chandigarh with Mr. Shubham Mangla, A.P.P. U.T., Chandigarh and Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate for the respondent – U.T., Chandigarh. Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** ***** ***** ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) The substantive prayer made in the petition in ““““It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that keeping in view the above stated facts and circumstances, present petition may kindly be allowed and: i) Order dated 08.08.2025 (Annexure P proclamation proceedings were initiate Order dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P- U.T. Chandigarh, whereby, the petitioner was declared proclaimed person in case (PCH-2289 of 2023) titled as "State Vs. Navneet Singla" arisen out of case F.I.R. No. 187, dated 13.07.2023, under Section 174 (now Section 209 of BNS), registered at P.S. Sector 36, (Annexure P-1), may kindly be quashed/set aside between the parties in the main case filed Negotiable Instruments Act, has been Deed dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P- Since the FIR in question, i.e., registered under Section 174-A of IPC, at Police Station Sector 36, Chandigarh 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH 2026 2026 2026 2026 ....Petitioner ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor U.T., Chandigarh with Mr. Shubham Mangla, A.P.P. U.T., Chandigarh and U.T., Chandigarh. s. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. The substantive prayer made in the petition in hand reads thus: It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that keeping in view the above stated facts and circumstances, present petition may kindly be allowed Order dated 08.08.2025 (Annexure P-3), whereby, the proclamation proceedings were initiated against the petitioner and the Order dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P-4), passed by Ld. Judicial Magistrate U.T. Chandigarh, whereby, the petitioner was declared proclaimed person 2289 of 2023) titled as "State Vs. Navneet Singla" arisen out case F.I.R. No. 187, dated 13.07.2023, under Section 174-A of the IPC (now Section 209 of BNS), registered at P.S. Sector 36, Chandigarh 1), may kindly be quashed/set aside as the entire dispute between the parties in the main case filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, has been amicably settled vide Compromise -6), in the interest of justice.”””” Since the FIR in question, i.e., FIR No.187 dated 13.07.2023, A of IPC, at Police Station Sector 36, Chandigarh ....Petitioner s It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that keeping in view the above stated facts and circumstances, present petition may kindly be allowed 3), whereby, the d against the petitioner and the Ld. Judicial Magistrate U.T. Chandigarh, whereby, the petitioner was declared proclaimed person 2289 of 2023) titled as "State Vs. Navneet Singla" arisen out A of the IPC Chandigarh as the entire dispute Section 138 of the amicably settled vide Compromise FIR No.187 dated 13.07.2023, A of IPC, at Police Station Sector 36, Chandigarh MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.24 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----25777 25777 25777 25777----2026 2026 2026 2026 2222 stands quashed vide order of even date passed in CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----25807 25807 25807 25807----2026 2026 2026 2026, the petition in hand has been rendered infructuous. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE July 23 July 23 July 23 July 23, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.24 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment