SAI TRADING CONSTRUCTION CO AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER
CWP/22198/2026 · 2026-07-21
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33411 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33411 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-22198-2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
134
CWP-22198-2026
Date of Decision: 21.07.2026
Sai Trading & Construction Company and another
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Sunil Polist, Advocate for the petitioners
(through Video Conferencing)
Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the outstanding amount against bills, Annexure P-3, to the petitioners along with interest at the rate of eighteen per cent per annum.
2.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from Mr. Jagdeep Dalal, Executive Engineer, Division-1, Public Health Engineering Department, Kaithal, submits that the aforementioned bills will be cleared and the sanctioned amount will be credited to the petitioners’ accounts within three months from today.
3.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. PAYAL 2026.07.24 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-22198-2026
-2-
4.
Ordered accordingly.
5.
In case the sanctioned amount is not credited to the petitioners’ accounts within the stipulated period, it shall carry interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum from expiry of the said period till actual payment.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 21.07.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2026.07.24 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment