Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33398 (KAR)

K. V. SOMASHEKHARA REDDY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23808/2026 · 2026-08-11

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529812026 NC: 2026:KHC:42448 WP No. 23808 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 23808 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. K. V. SOMASHEKHARA REDDY S/O LATE K.V.VENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. K.V.KODANDA RAMASWAMY REDDY S/ LATE K.V.VENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 3. K.V.CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY S/O LATE K.V.VENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT SARJAPURA SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE-562 125 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.D.R.RAVISHANKAR., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VIGNESHWARA U., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529812026 NC: 2026:KHC:42448 WP No. 23808 of 2026 M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE TAHASILDAR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL-562 104 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEDGE N.,HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, WRIT OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TAHASILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL TO RESTORE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE REVENUE RECORD (RTC) IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE LAND IN COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2011 PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS WELL AS IN COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER DATED.15.07.2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP.NO.19739/2017 (LR) VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529812026 NC: 2026:KHC:42448 WP No. 23808 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioners are seeking direction to respondent No. 3 - Tahasildar to restore the name of the petitioners in the revenue records in terms of the order dated 15.07.2025 in WP No. 19739/2017 (Annexure-B) passed by this Court. 3. Having heard Sri. D.R.Ravishankar, learned senior counsel for Sri. Vigneshwar.V, learned counsel for the petitioners and on careful consideration of the order dated 15.07.2025 in WP No. 19739/2017 produced at Annexure-B, wherein, the direction was issued to the respondent authorities to modify the entries in favour of the petitioners, as the WP No. 26096 of 2012 filed by the Wakf Board, assailing the order dated 31.10.2011 passed by the Land Tribunal (Annexure-A), came to be dismissed. 4. In that view of the matter, the letter dated 18.08.2025 (Annexure-C) by respondent No.3 to respondent No.2 seeking the direction, is a misnomer as this Court has - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010529812026 NC: 2026:KHC:42448 WP No. 23808 of 2026 already, held in favour of the petitioners herein as to the order passed by land Tribunal as per Annexure-A to the writ petition. 5. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, the letter addressed by respondent No. 3 to respondent No. 2 is inconsequential and respondent No.3 is directed to enter the name of the petitioners in the revenue entries in terms of the order dated 15.07.2025 in WP No. 19739/2017 (Annexure-B) within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31