Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33393 (KAR)

SMT DODDAMMA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/1276/2026 · 2026-08-12

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010020022026 NC: 2026:KHC:42795 WP No. 1276 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1276 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DODDAMMA D/O LATE DEVARAGOWDA @ MAALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALI, MYSURU TALUK-570 026. 2. SAKAMMA W/O LATE MAHADEVU. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU 570026. 3. KUMAR S/O LATE MAHADEVU. AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU - 570026. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010020022026 NC: 2026:KHC:42795 WP No. 1276 of 2026 4. SMT. MAALAMMA W/O. LATE SRI. MAALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU - 570026. 5. SMT. SUMA M. D/O. LATE SRI. MAALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU - 570026. 6. SMT. PUSHPALATHA M. D/O. LATE MAALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU - 570026. 7. SRI. RAMESHA M. S/O. LATE NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU - 570026. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BASAVANNA K.M., ADVOCATE) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010020022026 NC: 2026:KHC:42795 WP No. 1276 of 2026 AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU-570026. 2. THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSURU SUB DIVISION, MYSURU -570026. 3. THE TAHASILDHAR MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU -570026. 4. SRI. DODDEGOWDA S/O. LATE DODDEGOWDA ALIYAS SAPPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/O. NO.31 C, NUGGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBALL, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU- 570026. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS IMPUGNED DATED 05.08.2025 PASSED BY R1 IN RP NO. 132/2025 AND CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER DATED 06.03.2023 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN RA NO. 494/2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010020022026 NC: 2026:KHC:42795 WP No. 1276 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 05.08.2021, at Annexure-A, passed by respondent No.1 in R.P. No.132 of 2005, and the order dated 06.03.2023, at Annexure-B, passed by respondent No.2 in R.A. No.494 of 2022. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is noticed that the khata has been effected in favour of respondent No.4 based on the order dated 28.07.1975 passed by the Land Tribunal. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010020022026 NC: 2026:KHC:42795 WP No. 1276 of 2026 both the authorities have rightly taken a decision in the matter. Accordingly, no interference is called for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9