Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33390 (PNJ)

PARMINDER KAUR v. COMMISSIONER HISAR DIVISION HISAR CAMP AT SIRSA

CWP/15037/2026 · 2026-07-23

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15037-2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 PARMINDER KAUR ...PETITIONER V/S COMMISSIONER, HISAR DIVISION, HISAR CAMP AT SIRSA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Naveen Sihag, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to decide the appeal (Annexure P-2) in a time bound frame and to grant stay regarding dispossession from the property in question. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that since there is an interim order in the said appeal, thus, the present writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Ordered accordingly. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 23, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document