Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:12885
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2539 of 2026 1 - Manish Meshram S/o Shri Maniram Meshram Aged About 45 Years Presently Posted As Accountant At Central Jail, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Jail, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director General Jail And Correctional Services Chhattisgarh, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Superintendent Of Jail Central Jail, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - Collector And District Magistrate Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Sahil singh, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 18 /03/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus quashing the impugned show-cause notices dated 02.02.2026 and 08.02.2026 (Annexure P/1) issued by the Respondent No.3.. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to restrain the respondents from initiating
2 continuing any disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned notices dated 02.02.2026 and 08.02.2026. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to ensure protection of the petitioner from any further victimisation in connection with complaints made regarding financial irregularities. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem-fit and appropriate.”
2. On the objection being raised by the counsel for petitioner with regard to maintainability of the writ petition at this stage on the ground that the challenge in this writ petition is to the letter/notice seeking explanation from the petitioner only, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to repeat the prayer if any exigency so arises in future.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY