1 CGHC010322162026 2026:CGHC:38250 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1073 of 2026 1 - Vishnuram Markam Son Of Late Gokulram, Aged About 57 Years R/o Ward No. 10, Village Collery Tirra,tah. And District Dhamtari (C.G.) 2 - Ramesh Kumar Markam, Son Of Late Gokulram, Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 7, Village Junanapara Colliery Tirra, Tahsil And District Dhamtari (C.G.) 3 - Dinesh Kumar, Son Of Late Gokulram, Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No.10 Colliery Tirra,, Tahsil And District Dhamtari (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Sukham Bai Netam, D/o Late Gokulram, W/o Shri Ramesh Netam, Aged About 60 Years R/o 123 Vikas Chowk Bhandari Para Kanker,tah. And Distt. Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Rajmat Bai, D/o Late Gokulram, Wife Of Shri Arvinda Kumar, Aged About 47 Years R/o Ward No. 32, Vidhyawasani Ward Dhamtari, Tahsil And Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Ahimat Kunjam, D/o Late Gokulram, Wife Of Shri Mahanand Kunjam, Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 7, Purana Para, Colliery Tirra, Tahsil And District - Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Dasharibai Wife Of Shri Ramji, Aged About 67 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Maradev, Tahsil And District Dhamtari (C.G.) 2 - Aruna Bai, Wife Of Shri Babulal, Aged About 38 Years Caste Gond, R/o, Lodhipara, Raipur, Tahsil And District Dhamtari (C.G.) 3 - Ram Kumar, Son Of Shri Sukhuram, Aged About 61 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Baliyara, Tahsil And District Dhamtari (C.G.) 4 - The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District - Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.08.25 17:50:22 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Isha Jajodia, P.L. for the State (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 25/08/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach before the learned trial Court for filing a fresh application for framing additional issues. He would also submit that in such eventuality, the learned trial Court may be directed to decide the application in accordance with law. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 3. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of annexure to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit