Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3337 (ALL)

BRIJ PAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6703/2026 · 2026-05-04

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6703 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Tiwari, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Smar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Tanu Roopanwal, leaned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is a complainant, therefore, he has no lis to approach this Court that the inquiry initiated against the private respondent be expedited, therefore, the prayer for mandamus cannot be granted in the given circumstances. It is upto the concerned respondents to expedite it. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. May 5, 2026 Kumar Manish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Brij Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad