Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33369 (CAL)

SAYED ANWAR HALSANA AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22027/2026 · 2026-08-21

Suvra Ghosh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16 jdt. 21.08.2026 jb. WPA 22027 of 2026 (Sayed Anwar Halsana & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) Sarwar Jahan Mr. Tushar Sil Ms. Shalini Sen Ms. Sahina Parvin …. For the Petitioners Mr. Samit Kr. Dutta …. For the State Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. The petitioners who are members of Natidanga I Gram Panchayat seek police assistance so that the meeting fixed by the Prescribed Authority on 25th August, 2026 for election of a new Pradhan is held without any hindrance. The office of the Pradhan fell vacant upon removal of the Pradhan pursuant to which the Prescribed Authority, by a notice issued on 6th August, 2026 fixed the date of meeting for election of a new Pradhan on 14th August, 2026. The said meeting was postponed due to non-availability of police assistance. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to hold that since the date of meeting has been rescheduled on 25th August, 2026 the Officer in Charge, Thanarpara Police Station, being the 8th respondent herein, is directed to render necessary assistance to the Prescribed Authority so that the meeting is held 2 peacefully without any disturbance from any corner whatsoever. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Parties are at liberty to communicate the gist of the order to the concerned Authority at the earliest. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)