Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33360 (ORI)

GITANJALI BEHURA v. THE TAHASILDAR, PATTAMUNDAI,KENDRAPARA

WP(C)/23651/2026 · 2026-08-29

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No.23651 of 2026 ODHC010545832026 Gitanjali Behura …. Petitioner Represented by Mr. L.Pradhan, Advocate -Versus - The Tahasildar, Pattamundai …. Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. S.N.Patnaik, Additional Govt. Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 29.08.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to admit the writ application, issue notice to the opp.party to show cause as to why the prayer made here under shall not be allowed and upon perusing the causes, if any show, pleased to; (i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the opp.party for disposing of the Revision Case No. 193/2021 pending before him expeditiously within a time frame preferably within a month by the process the petitioner will get nature justice. And may further be pleased to pass such other order/orders as may deemed fit and proper. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall remain ever pray.” Order No. 01. 2 | P a g e 4. Considering the limited grievance, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Pattamundai to make an effort to dispose of the Revision Case above expeditiously, preferably within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak