Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33359 (MAD)

M.Manoj Kumar v. The State of Tamilnadu

CRL OP(MD)/10360/2026 · 2026-06-08

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10360 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.10360 of 2026 M.Manoj Kumar ... Petitioner/ Defacto Complainant Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its, The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi Sub Division, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents/ Complainants PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to withdraw the investigation in Crime No. 240 of 2026 on the file of the third respondent, and transfer the same to 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10360 of 2026 CBCID or any other independent investigating agency for conducting a fair, impartial and effective investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu for Mr.M.Pandian For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the defacto complainant in Crime No.240 of 2026, on the file of the third respondent police seeking to transfer the investigation from the file of the third respondent to any other compentent agency. 2. According to the learned counsel apeparing for the petitioner, on 08.05.2026, the petitioner and his family members were attacked by five accused persons and so far, no progress in the investigation. He further submitted that the petitioner is a practising advocate of this court and despite his efforts, the police officials have not taken any steps. 3. Per contra, the learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) appearing for the third respondent submitted that the first accused has been arrested on 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10360 of 2026 18.05.2026 and the other accused are absconding. Now the investigation is in the advanced stage and they are taking every effort to arrest the accused person. He further submits that the incident has taken place in a private exhibition hall and therefore, the CCTV footages are not available. 4. Considering the above said facts, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to monitor the investigation and after obtaining approval from the second respondent, the third respondent shall proceed to file charge sheet within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above said observation, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 08.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10360 of 2026 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi Sub Division, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10360 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Crl.O.P(MD)No.10360 of 2026 08.06.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis