- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010027542024 NC: 2026:KHC:40626 RPFC No. 8 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 8 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT HARSHITHA S. RAJ, W/O. SRI. P. SUBHASH, D/O SRI. B. SRINIVASARAJU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 2. MASTER VIHAAN SURYA S/O SRI. P.V SUBHASH AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS PETITIONER NO.2 IS MINOR AND HE IS BEING REPRESENTING BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER THE PETITIONER NO.1 BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 56, 9TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK RAMAKRISHNAGAR MYSORE- 570 022 REPRESENTING THROUGH HER GPA HOLDER SMT. MAMATH.M AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O B. SRINIASARAJU R/AT NO. 56, 9TH CROSS IST BLOCK, RAMAKRISHNAGARA, MYSURU -570 022. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ARJUN C., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVINDRA B S.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010027542024 NC: 2026:KHC:40626 RPFC No. 8 of 2024 AND: MR. P. V. SUBHASH, S/O SRI. P. VASUDEVA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO.8-11-184/5, BOOLMANDADODDI ROAD, SRI KRISHNADEARAYA COLONY, RAICHUR - 584 101. ALTERNATIVE ADDRESS: NETWORK ENGINEER JIO INFO COM LTD., TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE PROVIDER IN RAICHUR, ANAGHA COMPLEX, LINGASUR ROAD, NEAR CHANDRAMOLESHWAR CHOWK RAICHUR - 584 101 SRI. P.V. SUBHASH R/AT NO.125, 4TH CROSS 2ND MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR I STAGE, MYSURU - 570 017. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VINOD S., ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.08.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.508/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125(1) OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010027542024 NC: 2026:KHC:40626 RPFC No. 8 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Sri.Arjun representing Sri.Ravindra B.S., learned counsel on record for the petitioners submit that petitioners are not evincing interest in the matter. This Court through order dated 23.06.2026 directed petitioners to file translated copies of the documents which are not in English language. On 27.07.2026, learned counsel who represented petitioners sought time and accordingly time was granted. However, petitioners have not chosen to file the translated copies. On this day, learned counsel who represents the petitioners states that petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter. Having considered these facts, this Court is of the view that the revision petition is required to be dismissed for non- prosecution. Therefore, the revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP, CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35