IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 95/2026 Decided on: 20.04.2026 Dharam Parkash ...…Petitioner Versus C. Paulrasu & Anr. …….Respondents …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the compliance affidavit stands filed. A copy thereof was made available for perusal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the respondents have implemented the judgment in question, however, the same has been done only partially. Learned counsel further submits that the present proceedings may be closed, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for redressal of his surviving grievance(s), if any. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3. Taking note of the above, the present proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievance, if any, including against the consideration order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 20th April 2026 rohit