Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33342 (CHH)

RIYA RAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1316/2022 · 2026-08-23

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010259282022 2026:CGHC:37809-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1316 of 2022 1 - Riya Rai D/o Shri Suman Rai Aged About 26 Years R/o H.N. 57 Ward No. 1, P.V. 4 Pakhanjur, P.S. Pakhanjur, District Norgh Baster Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sunit Rai S/o Late Jogeshwar Rai Aged About 59 Years R/o H.N. 57 Ward No. 1, P.V. 4 Pakhanjur, P.S. Pakhanjur, District North Baster Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Rina Rai W/o Shri Sunit Rai Aged About 49 Years R/o H.N. 57 Ward No. 1, P.V. 4 Pakhanjur, P.S. Pakhanjur, District Norgh Baster Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Suman Rai S/o Shri Sunit Rai Aged About 30 Years R/o H.N. 57 Ward No. 1, P.V. 4 Pakhanjur, P.S. Pakhanjur, District Norgh Baster Kanker, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Choote Bethiya, District Norgh Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Tapas Mandal S/o Manind Mandal, Aged About 32 Years R/o Rengawahi P.S. Chhote Bethiya, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.1 /State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Aditi Parakh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 24.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Bhupendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Padney, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No.1 and Ms. Aditi Parakh, holding brief of Mr. Raja Sharma, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.2 2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of CRPC with the following prayer : “It is therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the application by quashing the impugned F.I.R. No. 07/2022 dated 30.07.2022 of the Police Station Chhote Bethiya, District – North Bastar Kanker, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits the present petition has been filed for quashing of the FIR and during pendency of the present petition, though charge-sheet has been submitted, but charges have not yet been framed. 4. In view of the same, we do not find any good ground for interference, accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to take recourse to law for quashing of the charge-sheet or if aggrieved by framing of the charge. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra