MOHAMMAD MUZAMIL NENGROO AND ORS. v. ADVOCATE GULZQAR HANIFA
CRM(M)/479/2024 · 2026-09-25
M A Chowdhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3334 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3334 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No.24 Regular list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M)/479/2024 CrlM/1098/2024
MOHAMMAD MUZAMIL NENGROO AND ORS Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs.
ADVOCATE GULZQAR HANIFA ...Respondent(s) Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER 25.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. So was the case on previous two dates as well which suggests that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute this petition any further. The petition is thus dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
;
(MA CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 25.09.2026
“Hilal”