Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33333 (KAR)

SRI. A. VENKATARAJU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22714/2026 · 2026-07-29

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010496212026 NC: 2026:KHC:39479 WP No. 22714 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 22714 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. A. VENKATARAJU S/O LATE ANNEPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/OF BAGALURU COLONY, JALA HOBLI, BAGALURU POST, YALAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU -562 149. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJU P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MS BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010496212026 NC: 2026:KHC:39479 WP No. 22714 of 2026 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, BENGALURU (ADDL.) NORTH TALUK, PRESENTLY YALAHANKA TALUK, YALAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 5. SRI. MUNIYAPPA B. N. S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS., SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA B.N., AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 6. SRI. MAHESHKUMAR S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA B.N., AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 7. SRI. PUNITHKUMAR S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, SL.NO.5 TO 7 ARE R/O BAGALURU VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH ADDL.TALUK, PRESENTLY YALAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 149. 8. SRI. M.A.SRINIVASA RAJU S/O LATE NARASARAJU.M.A., AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.24/1, 6TH CROSS, PRAKRUTHINAGAR, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010496212026 NC: 2026:KHC:39479 WP No. 22714 of 2026 KOGILU MAIN ROAD, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CASE NO.RP.NO.36/2022 ON THE FILE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, AT MANDYA AND IN A REVENUE APPEAL IN R.A. (BNA)557/2016-17 ON THE FILE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION AT BENGALURU AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 4. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 22.04.2025 in RP.No.117/2024 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2 and order dated 17.03.2017 and Corrigendum dated 05.05.2017 (Annexure-B) passed by respondent No.3. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010496212026 NC: 2026:KHC:39479 WP No. 22714 of 2026 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the mutation has been made, based on two registered sale deeds dated 15.12.1970 and 10.08.1971. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that, as the mutation has been made based on the registered sale deeds in respect of the subject land, there is no infirmity in the impugned orders passed by the respondent authorities to relegate the parties to establish right over the property in question. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30